Photoparoxysmal response and its characteristics in a large EEG database using the SCORE system.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize photoparoxysmal EEG response (PPR) using a standardized protocol of intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) and standardized definitions for PPR, classified into six types. METHODS: Using the SCORE system (Standardized Computer-Based Organized Reporting of EEG) we prospectively built a large database of standardized EEG annotations. In this study, we extracted the features related to PPR from the structured dataset consisting of 10,671 EEG recordings with IPS, from 7,188 patients. RESULTS: The standardized IPS protocol elicited PPR in 375 recordings (3.5%), in 288 patients (4%), with a preponderance among young (11-20 years) and female patients (67%). PPR was persistent in patients with multiple recordings. The most frequent type of PPR was activation of preexisting epileptogenic area (58%), followed by generalized-PPR limited to the stimulus train (22%). We could not find any recording with self-sustained posterior response. Seizures were elicited in 27% of patients with PPR, most often myoclonic seizures and absences, in patients with self-sustained generalized PPR. CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of PPR was accentuation of preexisting epileptogenic area. Self-sustained posterior response could not be documented. Self-sustained generalized-PPR had the highest association with seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Using standardized stimulation protocol and definitions for PPR types, IPS provides high diagnostic yield.

Interrater agreement of classification of photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response.

Our goal was to assess the interrater agreement (IRA) of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) using the classification proposed by a task force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), and a simplified classification system proposed by our group. In addition, we evaluated IRA of epileptiform discharges (EDs) and the diagnostic significance of the electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities. We used EEG recordings from the European Reference Network (EpiCARE) and Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG (SCORE). Six raters independently scored EEG recordings from 30 patients. We calculated the agreement coefficient (AC) for each feature. IRA of PPR using the classification proposed by the ILAE task force was only fair (AC = 0.38). This improved to a moderate agreement by using the simplified classification (AC = 0.56; P = .004). IRA of EDs was almost perfect (AC = 0.98), and IRA of scoring the diagnostic significance was moderate (AC = 0.51). Our results suggest that the simplified classification of the PPR is suitable for implementation in clinical practice.

Assessment of Predictors of Sun Sensitivity as Defined by Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype in an Ecuadorian Population and Its Correlation with Skin Damage.

BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick skin phototype scale (FSPTS) is a widely used instrument to assess skin type. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey collected responses from 254 subjects from Quito regarding self-reported FSPTS, gender, age, education, and tobacco and alcohol consumption. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine if ethnicity, hair color, and eye color significantly predict FSPTS. In addition, we studied the correlation between FSPTS and the SCINEXA scale with Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Ethnicity, eye color, and hair color are significant independent predictors of FSPTS (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient self-reported race and pigmentary phenotypes are inaccurate predictors of sun sensitivity as defined by Fitzpatrick skin phototype. Our study does not fully represent the population of the country. There are limitations to using patient-reported race and appearance in predicting individual sunburn risk.

Update on treatment of photodermatosis.

Photodermatoses are a group of skin conditions associated with an abnormal reaction to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. There are several of the photosensitive rashes which mainly affect the UV exposed areas of the skin. It can be classified into four groups: immunology mediated photodermatoses, chemical and drug induced photosensitivity, photoaggravated dermatoses, and genetic disorders. A systematic approach including history, physical examination, phototesting, photopatch testing, and laboratory tests are important in diagnosis of a photodermatosis patient. In order to optimally treat a disease of photodermatoses, we need to consider which treatment offers the most appropriate result in each disease, such as sunscreens, systemic medication, topical medication, phototherapy, and others. For all groups of photodermatoses, photoprotection is one of the essential parts of management. Photoprotection, which includes sunscreening and wearing photoprotective clothing, a wide brimmed hat, and sunglasses, is important. There are also promising emerging photoprotective agents.

A tale of two EEGs - Photic driving or photoparoxysmal discharge.

A 29-year-old woman has a history of developmental delay and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis resulting in kidney failure. She underwent renal transplant which unfortunately failed, and is on hemodialysis as well as immunosuppression including tacrolimus. She was recently hospitalized for urosepsis requiring intensive treatment with vasopressors and multiple antibiotics. Soon after discharge, she was noted to have unstable gait, multifocal twitches, falls, and very brief episodes of staring or inattentiveness. She was readmitted. Her head CT was normal and lumbar puncture was negative. A bedside EEG was requested and showed an unusual response during photic stimulation.

A review of UVA-mediated photosensitivity disorders.

A number of skin conditions are characterised by photosensitivity to UVA. Some of these are exclusively UVA-mediated conditions, while others include UVA in the action spectrum which also include UVB and/or visible light. This review aims to describe this diverse range of conditions for non-dermatologist scientists with an interest in this topic. As such, clinical details, including treatments, are brief and succinct. Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of these conditions is highlighted.

¿Existe el síndrome de Jeavons? Aportación de una serie de 10 casos / Does Jeavons syndrome exist? A report of a series of 10 cases

Introducción. El síndrome de Jeavons (SJ), o mioclonías palpebrales (MP) sin/con ausencias, es un síndrome epiléptico caracterizado por MP al cierre ocular, en ambiente luminoso, coincidentes en el electroencefalograma con descargas breves y generalizadas de polipuntas y polipunta-onda a 3-6 Hz. Asocia respuesta fotoparoxística en la fotoestimulación. La Liga Internacional Contra la Epilepsia (reconoce las MP como un tipo especial de crisis mioclónicas; sin embargo, sigue sin incluir el SJ como entidad propia en su clasificación de los síndromes epilépticos. Objetivo. Este artículo pretende aportar una serie de 10 casos y hacer hincapié en su descripción clínica y electroencefalográfica. Creemos que se trata de una entidad no infrecuente pero infradiagnosticada, y reseñamos los pros y los contras que determinan que hoy día siga la controversia sobre su reconocimiento como síndrome epiléptico independiente. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio restrospectivo de 10 casos recogidos durante el período 2002-2009 en nuestra Unidad de Epilepsia de adultos. Resultados. Todos nuestros pacientes cumplen criterios de SJ. Hay un predominio del sexo femenino (n = 8), con la existencia de casos familiares de epilepsia generalizada idiopática (n = 5), que asocian crisis generalizadas tonicoclónicas en casi todos (n = 9) y se encuentran bien controlados con tratamiento en monoterapia, aunque persisten las MP en tres. Todos presentan una exploración neurológica y una neuroimagen normales. Conclusión. El SJ es una epilepsia fotosensible dificilmente confundible con otras entidades; sin embargo, puede existir un solapamiento con otros síndromes de epilepsia generalizada idiopática que determine su infradiagnóstico. La genética y la neuroimagen funcional determinarán si se trata de una entidad independiente (AU)

Introduction. Jeavons syndrome (JS) or eyelid myoclonia (EM) with or without absences is an epileptic syndrome characterised by EM on closing the eyes, in bright environments, which coincides on the electroencephalogram with brief generalised polyspike and polyspike-wave discharges at 3-6 Hz. Photoparoxysmal response is associated in photostimulation. The ILAE recognises EM as a special type of myoclonic seizures, yet it still does not include JS as a separate condition in its classification of epileptic syndromes. Aim. The aim of this article is to report on a series of 10 cases, with special attention given to their clinical-electroencephalographic description. We believe it is a condition that is not infrequent, but one which is underdiagnosed. Moreover, we also want to highlight the pros and cons determining the fact that today there is still controversy about whether or not it should be recognised as an independent epileptic syndrome. Patients and methods. We conducted a retrospective study of 10 cases collected over the period between 2002 and 2009 in our adult Epilepsy Unit. Results. All our patients fulfilled JS criteria. There is a predominance of females (n = 8), with the existence of cases of idiopathic generalised epilepsy in the family (n = 5), which are associated with clonic-tonic generalised seizures in nearly all of them (n = 9) and are well controlled with treatment in monotherapy, although the EM persist in three cases. The results of a neurological exploration and neuroimaging are normal in all cases. Conclusions. JS is a photosensitive epilepsy that is not easily confused with other conditions; nevertheless, there can be an overlap with other idiopathic generalised epilepsy syndromes that lead to their being underdiagnosed. Genetics and functional neuroimaging will determine whether it is an independent condition or not (AU)

Photosensitivity skin disorders in childhood.

Photosensitivity in childhood is caused by a diverse group of diseases. A specific sensitivity of a child's skin to ultraviolet light is often the first manifestation or a clinical symptom of photodermatosis. It might indicate a serious underlying systemic disease such as lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis, or a rare group of genetic skin disorders like Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, Trichothyodystrophy, Bloom syndrome, Rothmund-Thomson and Kindler syndrome as well as metabolic disorders and cutaneous porphyria. Photosensitivity secondary to topical or systemic agents may also cause photosensitivity in children. Early recognition and prompt diagnosis may prevent complications associated with unprotected exposure to sunlight and avoid actinic injuries that can lead to malignant skin changes.

[Non-hereditary photodermatoses in childhood]. / Nichthereditäre Photodermatosen im Kindesalter.

Non-hereditary photodermatoses with well-known trigger factors and idiopathic light eruptions occur quite frequently during childhood and are at least temporarily associated with a marked impairment of quality of life in affected patients and their parents. Thus, it is crucial that the involved specialties are familiar with acquired UV-associated disorders in order to guarantee a quick diagnosis and effective therapy. Additionally, the recurrence of photodermatoses associated with potentially severe long-term complications has to be prevented. This requires a stringent prophylaxis that can only succeed after age-adapted instruction of the patient and parents.

[Histopathology of photodermatoses]. / Histopathologie der Photodermatosen.

Photodermatoses are skin disorders which result from abnormal response to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Photodermatoses include the following disorders: polymorphic light eruption, hydroa vacciniforme, solar urticaria, actinic prurigo, acute actinic dermatosis, solar dermatosis, phototoxic dermatitis and photoallergic dermatitis. The histopathology of these disorders will be presented and its role in making the diagnosis will be discussed.

[Hereditary photodermatoses]. / Hereditäre Photodermatosen.

Hereditary photodermatoses are characterized by an increased photosensitivity caused by an inherited single gene defect. With few exceptions, they manifest in early childhood, reveal heterogeneous clinical symptoms, and are difficult to treat. Although these diseases are rare, it is very important to make an accurate diagnosis on the basis of clinical symptoms, specific diagnostic tests, and direct DNA analysis. We review the spectrum of inherited photodermatoses, including porphyria cutanea tarda, erythropoietic protoporphyria, actinic prurigo, Kindler syndrome, and disorders associated with a defect in DNA repair, including xeroderma pigmentosum, trichothiodystrophy, Cockayne syndrome, and Bloom syndrome. Early diagnosis may prevent complications associated with prolonged unprotected exposure to sunlight and makes it possible to offer genetic counseling and, when indicated, prenatal diagnosis to families at risk for these rare heritable disorders.

[Laboratory tests and therapeutic strategies for the porphyrias]. / Labordiagnostik und Therapie der Porphyrien.

The porphyrias are a heterogeneous group of predominantly hereditary metabolic diseases resulting from a dysfunction of heme biosynthesis. Most of the porphyrias can manifest with a broad range of cutaneous symptoms on the sun-exposed areas of the body, whereas other variants reveal life-threatening acute neurological attacks. Further, mixed types of porphyrias exist. Besides the skin, other organs can be affected, such as the liver and the central nervous system. Therefore, interdisciplinary supervision of these patients is mandatory. In this review we will first present the clinical picture and diagnosis of the porphyrias, including the specific biochemical laboratory tests and a diagnostic algorithm. Thereafter, the current therapeutic concepts will be briefly addressed. Finally, we introduce the European Porphyria Initiative (EPI), an association of various European porphyria centers that is aiming at gathering the broad experience of internationally renowned porphyria experts for the development of European consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these metabolic disorders.

The difference between the constitutive and facultative skin color does not reflect skin phototype in Asian skin.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The assessment of the sensitivity of human skin to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is important in the area of phototherapy, photodermatoses, photo-aging, photo-carcinogenesis, and photo-protection. Some reports have shown that quantitatively measured skin color is a good indicator for predicting UV sensitivity to human skin in Caucasians. In this study, our aim was to define the correlation between skin color and the skin phototype assessed by the Fitzpatrick method in Asian brown skin. METHODS: A total of 180 medical students with similar life styles were included in this study. Their skin phototype was classified according to the system introduced by Fitzpatrick. Then, using a Minolta Spectrophotometer CM-2002, their skin color was determined on the buttocks and forehead. The buttock color was taken as the constitutive skin color, and the forehead color as the facultative skin color. Using these measured values, we compared the skin color with the skin phototype to find their correlation. Also, we investigated whether the difference between the constitutive and facultative skin colors of each individual had a relationship with his or her skin phototype. RESULTS: The constitutive skin color became darker with increasing skin phototype, and this change was statistically significant. As for the facultative skin color, it also became darker with increasing skin phototype, but was less well correlated with the skin phototype than the constitutive skin color. However, the difference between the constitutive and facultative skin colors did not show consistent results in predicting the skin phototype. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that the constitutive skin color can be a good indicator of the skin phototype. However, the difference between the constitutive and facultative skin colors of each individual does not give any meaningful information for the assessment of his or her skin phototype in Asian skin.

Xeroderma pigmentosum group E and DDB2, a smaller subunit of damage-specific DNA binding protein: proposed classification of xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and ultraviolet-sensitive syndrome.

Xeroderma pigmentosum is a rare photosensitive syndrome that comprises eight different genetic diseases (A to G; variant (V)). Although genotype-phenotype correlations have been evaluated in most XP groups, the relationship between the E subgroup of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP-E) and damage-specific DNA binding protein (DDB) still remained a mystery. Recent studies have provided new insight for XP-E and the role(s) of DDB2, a smaller subunit of DDB. Reclassification studies have confirmed that mutations in DDB2 give rise to XP-E. The mouse model of XP-E demonstrated that DDB2 was well conserved between mouse and human and was critical in controlling proper cell-survival through regulating the tumor suppressor p53-mediated responses after ultraviolet (UV)-irradiation: i.e. defective DDB2 causes the resistance to cell-killing by UV-irradiation due to decreased p53-mediated apoptosis. These phenotypes are unique to XP-E because other XP groups show normal (XP-V) or hypersensitivity (XP-A, B, C, D, F, and G) to UV-irradiation. Thus XP-E is defined as a skin cancer prone disease with unique resistance to UV-irradiation.